Comments on: Brooke Shields Child Porn Could Cost Tate $500k http://animalnewyork.com/2009/10/young-nude-brooke-shields-photo-could-cost-tate-500k/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:21:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fred Yarrow http://animalnewyork.com/2009/10/young-nude-brooke-shields-photo-could-cost-tate-500k/comment-page-1/#comment-23129 Fred Yarrow Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:54:29 +0000 http://animalnewyork.com/?p=40142#comment-23129 Yes back in 2000 somebody cherged Gross with multiple counts of manufacturing and distributing child pornography, he insisted on going to the Supreme Court and requested the MAXIMUM penalty allowed if found guilty. He was acquitted of all charges. I can't believe their lawyers don't know this. I believe the lawyers are running a scam. Yes back in 2000 somebody cherged Gross with multiple counts of manufacturing and distributing child pornography, he insisted on going to the Supreme Court and requested the MAXIMUM penalty allowed if found guilty. He was acquitted of all charges.

I can’t believe their lawyers don’t know this. I believe the lawyers are running a scam.

]]> By: Mikhail Rasputin http://animalnewyork.com/2009/10/young-nude-brooke-shields-photo-could-cost-tate-500k/comment-page-1/#comment-23120 Mikhail Rasputin Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:57:39 +0000 http://animalnewyork.com/?p=40142#comment-23120 The SUPREME COURT ruled the pictures in question are NOT pornograpic because they DO NOT portray Ms. Brooke in a manner that is considered to be sexually suggestive. The SUPREME COURT ruled the pictures in question are NOT pornograpic because they DO NOT portray Ms. Brooke in a manner that is considered to be sexually suggestive.

]]> By: Peter http://animalnewyork.com/2009/10/young-nude-brooke-shields-photo-could-cost-tate-500k/comment-page-1/#comment-10158 Peter Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:12:32 +0000 http://animalnewyork.com/?p=40142#comment-10158 And to think that her mother jumped at the $400 offered by the photographer at the time. What's worse - a mother prostituting her daughter off for financial gain or a museum for exhibiting the resulting photo decades later? And to think that her mother jumped at the $400 offered by the photographer at the time. What's worse – a mother prostituting her daughter off for financial gain or a museum for exhibiting the resulting photo decades later?

]]>