<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discovery Channel Netherlands Not For Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotspur</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12418</link>
		<dc:creator>hotspur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12418</guid>
		<description>Well, wow, thanks for the explanation(s).  But even now I am no closer to understanding how I am supposed to see these ads and think &quot;I wish I were watching the Discovery Channel.&quot; 
 
Although, on the plus side, I can make so little sense of it that I also don&#039;t see how it&#039;s sexist. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, wow, thanks for the explanation(s).  But even now I am no closer to understanding how I am supposed to see these ads and think &quot;I wish I were watching the Discovery Channel.&quot;</p>
<p>Although, on the plus side, I can make so little sense of it that I also don&#039;t see how it&#039;s sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copyranter</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12408</link>
		<dc:creator>copyranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12408</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mollena, that&#039;s exactly what&#039;s going on. But that doesn&#039;t explain the asinine strategy of the campaign. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mollena, that&#039;s exactly what&#039;s going on. But that doesn&#039;t explain the asinine strategy of the campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollena</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12407</guid>
		<description>The eyes are mismatched to the faces. 
 
I think perhaps the eyes are &quot;female&quot; eyes photoshopped into the faces of &quot;men&quot; and therefore a subtle twist on your perception. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eyes are mismatched to the faces.</p>
<p>I think perhaps the eyes are &quot;female&quot; eyes photoshopped into the faces of &quot;men&quot; and therefore a subtle twist on your perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12400</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12400</guid>
		<description>this is the same technique that was used in the Grizzly Bear video  &quot;two weeks&quot; - making the eyes super expressive and clear. 
 
I think it threatens masculinty to the point that men get insecure and indecisive when the see it, and therefore their senses are weakened and then are brandable. 
 
the video: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vimeo.com/5904993&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vimeo.com/5904993&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the same technique that was used in the Grizzly Bear video  &quot;two weeks&quot; &#8211; making the eyes super expressive and clear.</p>
<p>I think it threatens masculinty to the point that men get insecure and indecisive when the see it, and therefore their senses are weakened and then are brandable.</p>
<p>the video: <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/5904993" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/5904993</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotspur</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12397</link>
		<dc:creator>hotspur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12397</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand this campaign at all.  And I&#039;m super-intelligent!!!!1! 
 
The guys seem femmy to the point of maybe they&#039;re women in disguise?  But... in disguise to do what, watch TV in their own homes? 
 
Someone please explain the joke to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand this campaign at all.  And I&#039;m super-intelligent!!!!1!</p>
<p>The guys seem femmy to the point of maybe they&#039;re women in disguise?  But&#8230; in disguise to do what, watch TV in their own homes?</p>
<p>Someone please explain the joke to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

