<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discovery Channel Netherlands Not For Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:38:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hotspur</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12418</link>
		<dc:creator>hotspur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12418</guid>
		<description>Well, wow, thanks for the explanation(s).  But even now I am no closer to understanding how I am supposed to see these ads and think &quot;I wish I were watching the Discovery Channel.&quot;

Although, on the plus side, I can make so little sense of it that I also don&#039;t see how it&#039;s sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, wow, thanks for the explanation(s).  But even now I am no closer to understanding how I am supposed to see these ads and think &#8220;I wish I were watching the Discovery Channel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although, on the plus side, I can make so little sense of it that I also don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copyranter</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12408</link>
		<dc:creator>copyranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12408</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mollena, that&#039;s exactly what&#039;s going on. But that doesn&#039;t explain the asinine strategy of the campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mollena, that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s going on. But that doesn&#8217;t explain the asinine strategy of the campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollena</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12407</guid>
		<description>The eyes are mismatched to the faces.

I think perhaps the eyes are &quot;female&quot; eyes photoshopped into the faces of &quot;men&quot; and therefore a subtle twist on your perception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eyes are mismatched to the faces.</p>
<p>I think perhaps the eyes are &#8220;female&#8221; eyes photoshopped into the faces of &#8220;men&#8221; and therefore a subtle twist on your perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12400</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12400</guid>
		<description>this is the same technique that was used in the Grizzly Bear video  &quot;two weeks&quot; - making the eyes super expressive and clear.

I think it threatens masculinty to the point that men get insecure and indecisive when the see it, and therefore their senses are weakened and then are brandable.

the video: http://www.vimeo.com/5904993</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the same technique that was used in the Grizzly Bear video  &#8220;two weeks&#8221; &#8211; making the eyes super expressive and clear.</p>
<p>I think it threatens masculinty to the point that men get insecure and indecisive when the see it, and therefore their senses are weakened and then are brandable.</p>
<p>the video: <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/5904993" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/5904993</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotspur</title>
		<link>http://animalnewyork.com/2009/11/discovery-channel-netherlands-not-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12397</link>
		<dc:creator>hotspur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animalnewyork.com/?p=46958#comment-12397</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand this campaign at all.  And I&#039;m super-intelligent!!!!1!

The guys seem femmy to the point of maybe they&#039;re women in disguise?  But... in disguise to do what, watch TV in their own homes?

Someone please explain the joke to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand this campaign at all.  And I&#8217;m super-intelligent!!!!1!</p>
<p>The guys seem femmy to the point of maybe they&#8217;re women in disguise?  But&#8230; in disguise to do what, watch TV in their own homes?</p>
<p>Someone please explain the joke to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
