
Perhaps you’ve seen or heard of Coco Rocha. She’s a fairly well-known “supermodel” who has graced the covers of fancy magazines and all that other stuff that supermodels do. She recently created a bit of a buzz when she mentioned that at 6’0” 105lbs, she’s considered “fat” by the powers that be within the fashion world. She lamented, “I’m not in demand for shows any more. I’ve been told to lose weight even though I am really skinny.” Now today she’s posted a, well, let’s call it a manifesto since that word’s popular today, to her blog (A supermodel with a blog!) in which she basically bitchslaps the entire industry, comparing fashion big-wigs to child-labor sweatshop owners and tobacco industry executives.
I’m a 21 year old model, 6 inches taller and 10 sizes smaller than the average American woman. Yet in another parallel universe I’m considered “fat”… This was the subject of major discussion this week and the story that was spun was: “Coco Rocha is too fat for the runway”.
Is that the case? No. I am still used and in demand as a model. In fact I find myself busier than ever. In the past few years I have not gained an extreme amount of weight, only an inch here and there as any young woman coming out of her teenage years would.
But this issue of model’s weight is, and always has been of concern to me. There are certain moral decisions which seem like no brainers to us. For example, not employing children in sweatshops, and not increasing the addictiveness of cigarettes. When designers, stylists or agents push children to take measures that lead to anorexia or other health problems in order to remain in the business, they are asking the public to ignore their moral conscience in favor of the art.
Surely, we all see how morally wrong it is for an adult to convince an already thin 15 year old that she is actually too fat. It is unforgivable that an adult should demand that the girl unnaturally lose the weight vital to keep her body functioning properly. How can any person justify an aesthetic that reduces a woman or child to an emaciated skeleton? Is it art? Surely fashion’s aesthetic should enhance and beautify the human form, not destroy it.
…
As a grown woman I can make decisions for myself. I can decide that I won’t allow myself to be degraded at a casting – marching in my underwear with a group of young girls, poked, prodded and examined like cattle. I’m able to walk away from that treatment because I am established as a model and I’m an adult… but what about the young, struggling and aspiring models?
We need changes. I’d prefer that there would be no girl working under the age of 16, but if that has to be the case then I’d love to see teens escorted by a guardian to castings, shows, and shoots. The CFDA has set codes in place for their members and I’d love to see the entire industry follow. Society legislates a lot of things – no steroid use in sports is one example – its only reasonable that there be rules of conduct to keep the fashion industry healthy.
In the past, models have spoken out on this issue, only to be accused of saying something because their careers were on the brink of extinction. This is not so in my case. I actually first spoke out about this two years ago at the peak of what a model would consider the ideal career and indeed there was a reaction – those who were the worst offenders suddenly asked me to work for them! This was a public relations ploy and I wasn’t prepared to fall for that. I said “No, lets go a few seasons, lets see if you change, then I will work with you”. They didn’t change. I haven’t worked for them.
Of my generation of models I’m exactly where I need to be in my career and I’m grateful to use my position to actively speak out against this with the support of the CFDA and Vogue. My sincere hope is that through our efforts young models will one day be spared the humiliation, the risky weight loss, the depression that comes along with anorexia and the misery of abandonment by an industry ashamed to see them turn into actual women.
You go Coco! And here all along I thought the only girls named Coco were strippers!
Pic via Lani Biangco’s Flickr























The fashion industry is dominated by gay men who want to see the equivalent of young boys and/or what a drug addicted drag queen would look like prancing down a runway… Or they just want a living clothes hanger for the outfit. Until these ppl aren't considered the epitome of taste it will continue only to get worse.
Typical ignorance blaming it gay people. Get a clue.
I think it has less to do with gay and more to do with the fact that it's easier to produce clothing that looks decent on a body if that body doesn't have many curves. If you don't have to give much thought to how the cut will look on someone with hips and boobs and ass it's easier to design and produce. Or that's the impression I've gotten from Project Runway anyway.
As for Coco, that is awesome.
I think coke snorting gays are to blame. Who else would reject Coco Rocha? I mean, just look at her! And for 6'0", 105 lbs is really, really slim.
@Ann please give us a clue since you are so enlightened as to the major source of the problem.
Platypi seems you agree with the 'living clothes hanger', but then you validate that attitude by claiming that it's easier to make decent looking clothes for emaciated people? By and large, women are NOT that skinny, even in starvation conditions. Why bother making clothes for a segment of women that hardly exist? Because the people making the clothes have no REGARD for women. It's skinny MEN that don't have curves, but the hypocrisy inherent in the industry (catering to women, when there is no love for them or even an understanding of how they are built and what is desireable) means that the aesthetic is supposedly for women.
Understand the connection now?
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/0530d…
See even lesbians who are BFFs with Kate Moss agree.
http://www.onedatatime.com/dick_liker/2009/08/per…
I mean I could be off by a million miles. But don't act like people haven't thought about this. btw I know the fashion industry isn't 100% run by gay men, but their influence is undeniable. And the women in the biz perpetuating the same concepts are even worse. The gay guys are ignorant at least, the women (straight or gay) should know better.
First off let me apologize for my vague comment and I do not think I am so enlightened to the source of the problem. Blaming one group of people for a standard a whole industry backs up seems quite unfair. I recently worked for a female designer who, daily, pointed out that I was "fat". But that's one incident.
She should take her fat ass to a gym.
There shouldn't be any women under 18 working in that industry. Who are they making cloths for if they look "better on a human hanger?" It's not just gay men, women have been conditioned to hate their bodies and I'm sure a lot of size hate goes down on anyone who doesn't fit their ideal…whatever that is.
How is she fat!!? If she is fat…then I must a freakin sumo wrestler!
She should chuck up or shut up.
Not one of you has any clue what you are even talking about.
I have to say, that’s an unusually well-articulated post by a supermodel. Most barely seem to be able to string a coherent sentence together, and need heavy paraphrasing in interviews to be remotely intelligible.
As for weight, I would disagree that the prefered thin archetype in the super-modeling industry is due to the influence of homosexuals – such statements belie a very poor understanding of psychosexuality, and aberrencies thereof.
It is primarily to do with aesthetic criteria relating to forms and flow that are almost ontological in nature.
Psychometric studies looking at Cattell personality traits also show that thin women are also geared to appeal to patriarchally-inclined men, those who dominate the higher social echelons, as thinness is an index of dietary habits associated with a submissive mentality – excluding pathological conditions.