
While it’s common knowledge that the New York Post often rips off story ideas from local blogs—just ask editors from Gothamist, EV Grieve, New York Shitty, Vanishing New York, Sheepshead Bites* and a handful of others—their latest article on the bombing of the Bowery mural, which was basically lifted from several ANIMAL posts, was particularly egregious.
Now, to be fair, Post scribe Stefanie Cohen did do some original reporting. She was able to track down REMO and get quotes out of him, TWIST and others. However, it hard to believe she would even have a story had she not been trolling ANIMAL. Lets take a look at the glaring similarities and you can all decide for yourselves. UPDATE: At a little after 5pm on Monday, the New York Post corrected the story and gave proper attribution of the Kenny Scharf quote!
NYP:
Scharf’s mural was next. He was filmed saying he thought his wall would be respected: “I’m not Shepard Fairey. Not to knock him or anything, but I’m not putting up wallpaper made safely in a studio.”
Hmm. Two things: 1) This statement is incorrect. 2) It’s unaccredited. Kenny Scharf exclusively gave me that quote in person and I published it here (November 29th).
ANIMAL:
No, I’m not Shepard Fairey. Not to knock him or anything, but I’m not putting up wallpaper made safely in a studio.
Other things I found disturbing in the article:
NYP:
It wasn’t even complete before a tagger named NAW hit it.
This was exclusively reported on ANIMAL here (April 22nd).
ANIMAL:
A little before 2AM last night, graffiti writer NAW decided to contribute to Shepard Fairey’s 99% done mural on Houston Street…
NYP:
Ironically, regular folks were inspired to write their names in pen, adding their contribution to the piece.
Again, this was also exclusively reported on ANIMAL here (November 15th) and worded similarly.
ANIMAL:
It’s kind of ironic that vandals have mostly respected the wall, while the general public hasn’t, no?
I will admit that I’m partially at fault here. I should probably have never spoken to Stefanie Cohen for 15 minutes last Wednesday and brought the clueless reporter up to speed on all the goings-on at the Bowery mural. I also should have never believed her after she frantically called me twice late last night and sent numerous text messages promising to correct the online edition, which as of 1:00PM, still hasn’t been edited. Cohen also said she’d get a printed correction—can’t wait to see that!
Btw, the two photographers who weren’t credited might want to consider contacting the Post as well:

*Ned from Sheepshead Bites tends to get ripped of by all of Newscorp’s outlets.
























you people are such self-wounded hypocrites. your entire site is about ripping off others people's material.
animal is gay and gayer for acting as if you have some sort of journalistic moral code.
@ogf: Nice use of gay.
That reporter should be embarrassed. What was her thought process?
the post is such a fucking joke.
And 1 more person learns you cannot trust reporters.
So are you suggesting The Post should never have done the story at all? Isn't it a positive thing to see street art intelligently written about in the mainstream press?
No, that's not what I'm suggesting at all and don't think that's even implied here. I'm simply saying that if the "mainstream press" is going to write "intelligently" about a particular subject they should get it right and attribute sources.
Jeffery Deitch wrote this article?
whoooooooooooooo caresssssssssssssssssssssssss
keep graffiti off the internet out of newspapers and blogs.
anyone else see how utterly hilarious all of this is? A dog chasing it's own tail.
Right from the reporting of such terrible 'art' all the way up to the analytical posting here attempting to claim credit for "up to the minute news" on a wall…on a street…
A single wall…on a single street…
If they were stealing and appropriating actual journalistic writing (you know – the kind that is more than a blurb with a five minute attention span) I can see the fuss…but right now all I see is self-entitled navel-gazing from the new post-hipster consumer culture whose greatest cares seem to be tracking down lowly graffiti artists, placing them on invisible pedestals and getting quotes all about … a single wall…on a single street…
Scharfs mural isn't even good – artistically speaking. Actually none of his work is. Are people hoping or banking on the fact he may be considered 'important' 50 years from now?
We're doomed.
I thought you did a good job following this story as it is a microcosm of that state of street art in this day and age. The Post clearly copied your idea without giving you credit. If they were a blog, that'd be one thing, but a supposed journalist did this. Pretty fucking lame.
Hmm. The whole "righteous indignation" thing would be much more compelling if you weren't serving your own interests. This is definitely better suited to a diary entry.
This is too silly to answer in my own words, so I'll quote Eminem: "We're entertainers, of course this shit's affecting our sales. You ignoramus." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfcZeLpWQsY
so the NY POST appropriating a few banal lines from what is essentially a 'blog post' is stealing your sales? In other words – people are seeking information from the NY Post instead of your site because of this?
I think the readership of Animal is going to stay the readership of Animal for a number of reasons…
NO! Sigh! Context is key. I suggest you either, re-read the response to El Diablo or re-listen to the song.