Hoping to avoid the stigma of a Superfund project which could “scare away developers,” the city is proposing a new plan to cleanup the polluted Gowanus Canal. Officials claim their proposal would more quickly rid the waterway of “pesticides, metals and cancer-causing chemicals called PCBs” and “allow polluters to voluntarily pay for the cleanup” costs. Naturally, E.P.A. officials are skeptical that the nearly dozen responsible parties would ever come to agreement with one another. |NYT|
The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to declare Brooklyn’s Gowanus Canal a Superfund site, a move that would bring in federal money to thoroughly cleanup the polluted waterway. The EPA reports that sediment in the canal is “contaminated with a variety of pollutants, including pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals and volatile organic contaminants (VOCs), and significant contamination associated with coal tar.” There’s widespread support for flushing out the canal, however critics worry that proposed developments in the area will be delayed, or even killed, by the cleanup efforts. Some developers are even concerned that the Superfund status has too much negative stigma, as though the 1.8-mile cesspool didn’t have any already. |NY Times|
Photo by Will Sherman
Editor-in-Chief:
Bucky Turco
Contributors:
Copyranter
Kari Ferrell
Marina Galperina
Website design:
Michael Ian Weinfeld
